Peer Review of Code: Reviewer's Survey

Page 1 of 3

Closes 31 Jul 2026

This service needs cookies enabled.

Page 1

1. Name:

Name: (Required)

2. How did the peer review process go overall?

(Required) Very poorly Poorly Neutral Well Very well

3. In a few words, how would you describe your experience?

In a few words, how would you describe your experience? (Required)

4. Roughly how much time did you invest?

(Required) <1 day 1–2 days 3–5 days 5 days +

5. Was the time commitment reasonable?

(Required) Yes No Not sure

6. Did you learn anything from participating?

(Required) A lot A little No

7. How easy was it to review the code you were given?

(Required) Very difficult Difficult Moderate Easy Very easy

8. Did you feel you had enough context to review effectively?

(Required) Yes Partly No

9. What challenges did you face when reviewing?

What challenges did you face when reviewing? (Required)

10. How useful was the review checklist (if you used it)?

Not useful at all Slightly useful Moderately useful Useful Very useful

11. What improvements would you suggest to the checklist?

What improvements would you suggest to the checklist?

12. What should be improved in the peer review process before being rolled out more widely?

What should be improved before rolling out more widely? (Required)

13. Would you take part in peer code review again?

(Required) Yes No Maybe

Citizen Space from Delib